CPG Aeronautics….

Cornelius Gould's rocketry blog

Recent Posts

  • Next five Missions to come in the DEMO flight test series
  • DEMO-2 mission
  • The road to my Level 2 Certification attempt: The DEMO-1 mission
  • PLS-5016 & 5017: Ares’ Maiden voyages
  • PLS-5014 & 5015: Nesaru returns to the sky

>>>> Next Launch

  • No dates present

Search

CPG Aeronautics Links

  • About This Site…
  • X2-Artemis Launch Vehicle family
  • The History

Interesting Links

  • My Rocketry Club
  • Our Twitter Feed!
  • The Rocketry Forum
  • The Rocketry Planet
  • Ye Olde Rocketry Forum

ALS-051 Highlights

Feb26
by cgould on February 26, 2013 at 11:31 PM
Posted In: XR2 (Artemis) Medium power booster Project

(Saturday Feb 9, 2013 – O’Reily Field)

The 51st launch of the Artemis Launch System was a beautiful sight!

ALS-051 Liftoff!!

 

Nala1 lifted off on her first “full power” flight on a G-64 motor. This mission had two objectives.

1) To finally reach the “maximum altitude” for the Artemis rocket design.
2) To prove the reliability of a new on-board battery to power all of her electronics.

Both goals were met – or exceeded expectations!

On her way to 2052 feet on a beautiful cloudless / windless day!

 

Nala1 reached an altitude of 2052 feet. The highest altitude of any of my rockets to date, easily beating X4 Perseus Eagle’s estimated 1700 foot record from last year.  Top speed was about 420 MPH.  Quite impressive!

Flight data from ALS-051. Click on image to expand.

The only problem I encountered involved the on-board video camera, which gets to be a bit flaky in cold weather. All was not lost as a friend of a friend brought along a video camera, and took a pretty cool video record of the flight!

Video to be posted soon on the CPG Aeronautics You Tube channel.

Nala1 is now undergoing deep inspection / refurbishing work after a busy year of continuous flights. Next launch is set for late March 2013.

((( )))

 Comment 

Nesaru X6 and Nala1 power retrofit nearing completion…

Dec26
by cgould on December 26, 2012 at 9:48 PM
Posted In: XR2 (Artemis) Medium power booster Project, XR6 (Perseus V) high power booster.

(December 26, 2012 – Cuyahoga Falls)

After the hair raising shakedown flight of Nesaru X6 / Zephyr last November, all of my rockets were grounded pending a look into the failure mode of the power systems on board Nesaru, and an effective solution.

A final verdict on the failure mode

In a nutshell, the power system problem was due to the colder temperatures causing diminished performance with the on-board batteries. This prevented the black powder charges from firing at apogee, and at the per-determined altitude for the deployment of the main parachute.

The temperature wasn’t at an extreme cold, but “cold enough”. 40° F (about  5° C), was cold enough to cause the on-board batteries to run at an extremely diminished capacity.

Studies by Engineers at my place of employment confirmed this (they had a blast troubleshooting this issue!).

It has been determined that the best “all weather battery” for the job is the Lithium Polymer battery.  Even the tried and true Alkaline 9 volt battery, which has been the staple power plant for rocketry electronics for years showed to be almost marginal in cold temperatures.  Lithium Polymer can provide power in cold temperatures with ample amounts of “headroom” to spare when used in extremely cold temperatures.

On that note, the supplies were ordered, and a multi-week long project began to retrofit Nesaru, and Nala1 to operate using Lithium Polymer batteries.

Lithium Polymer batteries for Nesaru X6 and Artemis / Nala1. A 9 volt battery is shown for comparison.

Not only are Lithium Polymer (LiPo or LiPoly) batteries better in the cold weather, they are also capable of supplying many tens of amps of power at an instant.   This is much more than what the “model rocketry standard” 9 volt battery can supply, and way more than the A-23 batteries I’ve been flying can deliver.

Nesaru X6 electronics bay sled assembly with LiPo battery installed.

Nesaru required only a few modifications to support the LiPo battery retrofit, while Nala1 needed a longer electronics bay to properly accomodate one.  As a result, Nala1 will be a few inches longer than before.

The weight of the lithium polymer battery is heavier than the A-23 itself, but only a couple of ounces heavier than the A-23 battery, it’s holder, and the hardware (screw and nut) to mount it to the electronics sled.  This should pose no real impact to the performance of either rocket.

Nesaru’s launch weight is about 4 pounds.  Nala1 1.5 pounds.  The additional ounce or two won’t make much of a difference.

Work is expected to be completed to both rockets in time for a mid January launch for both rockets from O’Reily field.

((( )))

1 Comment

I got Nesaru X6 off the ground…finally….

Nov26
by cgould on November 26, 2012 at 2:33 AM
Posted In: XR6 (Perseus V) high power booster.

(November 25, 2012 – O’Reilly Field)

Since only one NAR member was present, I could not launch Zephyr myself as a Level 1 attempt, so Andrew K. and Mark Rectenwald of MTMA took the controls for me.  We considered this a “shakedown flight”.

The X6 Nesaru rocket “Zephyr” took to the sky (Finally!) today on its maiden voyage.  Zephyr hit a peak altitude of 1746 feet, and made it there in a FLASH with a peak speed of 560 MPH!

Nesaru on the launch pad. MTMA President Mark Rectenwald inspecting things before launch.

Zephyr just before hitting 560 MPH…

That’s the upside…

The downside, the cold weather made the on-board batteries basically ineffective, and NONE of the events happened except for the last resort backup charge.

The purpose this backup charge is to separate the rocket if a loss of computer control ever happens.  This prevents a VERY dangerous collision with person or property.

The emergency backup systems made for a very rough landing for Zephyr, but much better than drilling nose first deep (as in a couple of feet) into the ground!

On the upside to that, 80% of the rocket was either undamaged, or had very minor damage.  One of the sections made to absorb the shock of rough landings was destroyed.

By the end of the day, I managed to complete much of the structural repairs, and work on replacing all of the external electrical conduits & connections will begin soon.  All of the external wiring on the rocket was destroyed on the rough landing.

Weather permitting, another attempt could happen as soon as later next month.

More news soon!

((( )))

 Comment 

The Next Step…

Nov04
by cgould on November 4, 2012 at 10:20 AM
Posted In: CG's Rocket Thoughts..., XR9-C (Comanche) High Power Launch Vehicle

(Saturday, November 3, 2012 – Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio)

Introducing:The XR9C Comanche

A computer rendering of the finished Comanche XR9C rocket design…

Construction of the next generation rocket design is underway! The XR9 Comanche represents the latest in the “state of the art” for my rocket fleet, embodying the best of all the previous designs, and some of the latest tech all in one rocket.

Launch events will be controlled by an on-board flight computer, as well as a second computer to control on-board activities such as cameras, transmitters, etc.

I’ve used the “code name” “Harmon Field Flier” for this rocket as it is designed to operate on fields as small as our Harmon Flying Field in Aurora. But its capability is not limited there. It will be able to be configured to operate as a “quasi-Level 1” rocket on larger fields as well!

Some of the on-board technologies (such as the baffle systems, and the shear pin system) are derived from the X6 Nesaru rocket. Others are adapted from the X2 Artemis rocket program.

The main focus of the XR9 Comanche (besides pure fun) will be gathering in-flight data for detailed analysis on the operating forces at work during hobby rocket launches to aid in the design of upcoming “payload” rockets. Namely, my proposed RC boost glider project “Carina Shuttle”.

About the name designation.

XR9 Comanche is eXperimental Rocket (XR) design #9, and is nicknamed “Comanche”. There were 4 different configurations I’ve been toying with over the past year. The XR9, XR9A, XR9B, and finally, the configuration that I ultimately chose, the XR9C.

About my “X” rocket program.

All of the previous experimental rockets in my fleet had simple “X” designations. I’ve updated the nomenclature to allow for delineation between eXperimental Rockets (XR), and eXperimental Airplanes (XA).

So, all previous rockets, such as the fore-mentioned “X2 Artemis” are now (technically speaking) XR rockets. So “X2 Artemis” will also be known as “XR2 Artemis”.

The maiden flight of XR9C Comanche is planned for March 2013. More on that as we get closer…

((( )))

 Comment 

Weather forces a ‘scrub’…

Oct29
by cgould on October 29, 2012 at 12:10 AM
Posted In: XR6 (Perseus V) high power booster.

(Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio – Oct. 28, 2012)

Well, as expected, the weather situation has forces a scrub of this weekend’s maiden launch of the X6 Nesaru rocket.

The next opportunity for launch for Nesaru will be the morning of November 24th….

More details later…

((( )))

 Comment 
  • Page 9 of 43
  • « First
  • «
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • »
  • Last »
June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« Sep    

Categories

  • Carina Shuttle Project
  • CG's Rocket Thoughts…
  • Current (Active) Projects
  • Dual Deployment Project
  • Featured Picture
  • General News
  • Launch and Recovery projects
  • Level1 Certification
  • Podcast
  • Random Stuff
  • The Road to Level 2 Certification
  • Twitter_log
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
  • XR1 (Aquila) Boster Project
  • XR10 – (Zephyr) Project Zephyr
  • XR2 (Artemis) Medium power booster Project
  • XR3 (Pegasus) High Performance Booster
  • XR4 (Perseus) Medium Power Booster project
  • XR5 (Aurora) Medium Power Booster
  • XR6 (Perseus V) high power booster.
  • XR9-C (Comanche) High Power Launch Vehicle

©2010-2020 CPG Aeronautics.... | Powered by WordPress with Easel | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑